Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00538
Original file (BC 2014 00538.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00538
		
      XXXXXXXXXXXXX			COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  YES



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 6 Jun 13 (actual test in AFFMS is 25 Jun 13) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The sit up component of the contested FA was unjustly administered by the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) representative.

After completing 37 repetitions of the sit-up component of the FA, the FAC administrator terminated the test 5 seconds early due to the applicant’s “incorrect form.” However, according to AFI 36-2905 A7.2.6, the sit up component of the test may be terminated for two reasons alone: when the member rests in the down position or when the member holds his or her knees while resting in the up position.  Additionally, in accord with 
AFI 36-2905, if the member does not complete the correct form for the sit-up then the member must be told what he or she is doing incorrectly and the incorrect sit ups are not to be counted.  In this respect, the FAC administrator did not inform the applicant what he was doing wrong and does not have the authority to terminate a test for any other reason including “incorrect form.”  Due to this error the applicant was unable to meet the minimum score of 39 repetitions.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal letter to the board, a memorandum from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated and a memorandum from the FAC administrator indicating that the test should not have been terminated.   

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.




STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date of the contested FA the applicant was serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6).

On 25 Jun 13, the applicant participated in an FA, attaining an overall composite score of 82.40, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following composite scores: Cardio – 11:43/52.40 points, Abdominal Circumference – 27.00”/20.00 points, 
Push-ups – 76/10.00 points, Sit-ups – 37/0.00. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit B.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval to remove the FA dated 25 June 13, which was the actual test date in the Air Force Fitness Management System.  IAW AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (dated 3 Jan 13) Paragraph A7.2.6 "If the member rests in the down position or holds onto their knees/legs while in the up position, the sit-up component of the assessment will be terminated."  After a thorough review of the documentation provided by the applicant, there is sufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim. The Fitness Program Manager stated that she terminated the test due to improper form.  With that being the case, the applicant's FA should not have been terminated, he should have only been told what he was doing incorrectly and the sit-ups done improperly should not have counted.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

4.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 25 June 2013, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00538 in Executive Session on Tuesday, 16 Jun 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 14.

						










Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02468

    Original file (BC 2013 02468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02468 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Nov 12, which resulted in a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and consequent discharge board, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02064

    Original file (BC 2013 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove FA score from AFFMS dated 28 Aug 12. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03983

    Original file (BC 2013 03983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the FAC waited until 45 seconds into the assessment to tell the applicant to “fix her body.” She has never failed an FA before or since the contested assessment. FAC augmentee or another member paired to accomplish muscle fitness components will monitor and count the correct number of push-ups. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03075

    Original file (BC 2013 03075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s FAs since she entered the service is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 3 Jul 13 75.67 Exempt Satisfactory *15 Apr 13 81.00 25/0.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Nov 12 87.10 38/6.00 Satisfactory 16 Apr 12 84.10 42/7.50 Satisfactory *Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis that, “The applicant’s injury was validated by the applicant’s medical provider, but there was no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03583

    Original file (BC 2013 03583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03583 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 May 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Moreover, the FAC manager’s opinion is based on a demonstration by the applicant after the contested FA was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01022

    Original file (BC-2012-01022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 13 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Incorrect sit-ups (e.g., elbows do not touch the knees or thighs at the top of the sit-up, shoulder blades do not touch the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02524

    Original file (BC 2013 02524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This will count as one sit-up.” The applicant’s last 3 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-ups Rating 22 Mar 2013 94.80 49 Excellent *05 Mar 2013 85.30 39 Unsatisfactory 05 Mar 2012 93.70 47 Excellent *Contested FA On 16 Oct 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically witness statement to support injustice.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05872

    Original file (BC 2013 05872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her appeal the applicant submits a personal memorandum to the board and a letter from her commander requesting the contested FA be invalidated. At the time the application was submitted, the applicant had not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 14.